CCHR Working to Restore Parental Rights in Florida

CCHR has educated 135,000 families at over one hundred community events as part of a campaign they are spearheading to put an end to the violation of parental rights.

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), a non-profit mental health watchdog dedicated to the eradication of abuses committed under the guise of mental health, has reached almost 135,000 families in a campaign to prevent abuse of the Baker Act by educating families on their rights and exposing unnecessary involuntary examination of minors in Florida.

Currently in Florida a minor may be sent for involuntary examination without parental knowledge or consent. This law is commonly known as the Baker Act. In 2014, close to 31,000 minors were sent to psychiatric receiving facilities without parental consent.

Spearheading a campaign to put an end to this violation of parental rights, CCHR has worked to educate families at over one hundred community events in addition to launching a postcard campaign designed to educate parents and guardians on their rights under the law reaching almost 135,000 families in the Tampa Bay area.

“We receive too many calls from parents whose children were Baker Acted off of school grounds without their parents” consent or even knowledge, said Diane Stein, President of CCHR Florida. “The youngest child we have helped was just 5 years old and in the majority of instances the criteria for involuntary examination were not met.”

A major focus of this campaign is education on the law. In order to be sent for involuntary examination under the Baker Act three criteria must be met. However, individuals charged with initiating an involuntary examination have watered the criteria down and with the increasing number of initiations the law appears to be being used as a disciplinary tool.

In the current Florida Statutes, as part of the criteria, it states, “Without care or treatment, the person is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for himself or herself; such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm to his or her well-being; and it is not apparent that such harm may be avoided through the help of willing family members or friends or the provision of other services.” F.S. 394.463 Unfortunately calling upon ‘willing family members’ is usually not the first course of action.

“In the vast majority of instances, parents can and should be called first, before involuntary examination is initiated,” said Diane Stein. “This is not happening and it is a gross violation of parental rights.”

For more information, to sign a petition to restore parental rights or to download a copy of a legal form designed to help protect a child from unnecessary involuntary examination, visit either or

– See more at: